In the
previous chapter, different methodologies for rank level fusion were obtainable.
These methods included plurality voting method, highest rank method, Borda
count method; logistic weakening method and quality based rank fusion method
for multimodal biometric system. Among those methods, the logistic weakening
method constantly provides high Performance, however it still has some
drawbacks. The results obtained through this method can be varied considerably
for different datasets due to their miscellaneous qualities. Logistic deterioration
method for a multimodal dataset with the same image quality will produce
results similar to Borda count method, as the assigned weights to different
biometric matchers’ outputs will be the same.
A Markov chain is named for the
Russian mathematician Andrei Andreyevich Markov. It is a mathematical model
that can be thought of a being in exactly one of a number of states at any time
(Markov, 1906). A Markov chain has a set of states, S = {s1; s2;:::;
sr}. The process
starts in one of these states and moves successively from one state to another
(Kemeny, Snell, & Thompson, 1974). Each move is referred to as a step. If the chain is currently in state si,
then it can move to state sj with a probability pij.
This probability is preset at the beginning of the process and does not depend
on how the state was reached. The probability pij is referred to
as transition probabilities. The process can remain in the same
state with probability pii. The starting state is given by an initial
probability distribution (Kemeny, Snell, & Thompson, 1974).
In
2011, Monwar and Gavril ova (2011) utilized Markov chain as a method for
biometric rank combination. This approach brought a new dimension to the
current ways of biometric rank aggregation and can be effectively used by the
homeland and border security forces and by other cleverness services.
They
considered the biometric rank aggregation similar to a voting mechanism. In the
multimodal biometric rank fusion process, the classifiers are considered as
voters. So, if there are three biometric traits used in a multimodal biometric
system, the number of voters in the system would be three. Those three voters
or classifiers manufacture three ranking list based on the comparison or
distance scores of test and template biometric data. The final process is to
combine the ranking lists obtained from three classifiers or voters to make a
consensus ranking lists to find out the preferred identity or alternative from
the system.
The
same two datasets which were used in the experiments involving Markov
chain-based rank fusion are used. Here, comparison has been made on fuzzy
fusion approach with unimodal matchers, with the rank fusion approaches and
with Match score and decision fusion approaches which is shown in through
Figures 6-11.
The
fuzzy logic based fusion approach for multimodal biometric system has been
described. It is a powerful intelligent tool used in many cognitive and
decision-making systems. After discussing the basics of fuzzy logic, the fuzzy
fusion mechanism in the context of a multimodal biometric system has been
illustrated. A brief discussion on the research conducted for fuzzy logic based
fusion in different application domains has also been presented. The system
overview and the choice of fuzzy rules to govern the system have been
presented. The biggest advantage of the system is that instead of binary Yes/No
decision, the probability of a match and confidence level can now be obtained.
No comments:
Post a Comment